{"id":3297,"date":"2020-02-07T18:30:24","date_gmt":"2020-02-07T18:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bloomsoup.com\/?p=3297"},"modified":"2021-09-19T16:07:16","modified_gmt":"2021-09-19T16:07:16","slug":"familiarity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bloomsoup.com\/familiarity\/","title":{"rendered":"The Familiarity Heuristic: Worthwhile Principle or Unhelpful Bias?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Have you ever persisted with something that wasn\u2019t in your best interests? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Either a job you disliked, a destructive habit or unfulfilling relationship? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s not that we don\u2019t know what to do, rather we just can\u2019t bring ourselves to do it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is that? I mean, if we can diagnose the problem, it should be an easy fix. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

And yet these situations frequently persist for years leading to an undercurrent of anger, crawling snake-like, beneath the skin. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The familiar <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Humans love what they know. Why? Because what\u2019s known is safer than the mysterious candyland out there, full of evil clowns.

On a biological level, maximising happiness isn\u2019t high on the agenda.

Neurologically, we\u2019re geared first and foremost for survival, everything else secondary.

So even if that unspeakably irritating situation is causing significant distress or unhappiness, at least it\u2019s the safer option.

You’re alive and potentially able to reproduce, so your DNA is joyous, even if you are not.

Breaking free from unenviable situations in the search of something better, at least on a neurological level, is considered a risky move.

There’s even some fancy scientific-sounding terms to support this little theorem about familiarity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mere-exposure effect<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This is sometimes called the familiarity principle and is based on the fact that people tend to display a preference for that with which they’re most familiar.

From language to people and situations, we tend to gravitate towards what we know.

This can obviously be an issue if we stuck in the old proverbial rut.

Best developed by Robert Zajonc, the principle shows that when organisms are initially exposed to a novel stimulus, they exhibit fear and avoidance.

With each subsequent exposure, this reaction diminishes, until the response becomes one of interest and curiosity, and eventually, affective liking.

Interestingly, Zajonc tested subjects through the use of priming exposure with different levels of conscious awareness.

He discovered that positive feelings are maximised when subjects aren’t consciously aware of their repeated exposure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Familiarity heuristic<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In many ways, this heuristic is synonymous with the mere-exposure effect.

Born on the work of Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman<\/a> and their discovery of the availability heuristic, the familiarity heuristic provides a cognitive shortcut or rule of thumb to guide our behaviour.

Just as the principle above affects our preference, so this framework allows us to alter our behaviour based on our previous reactions.

The heuristic assumes that if we react in the same way to a similar situation, the results will stay the same.

This is useful because it can save us time and mental resources in new situations, especially when we’re under increased cognitive load.

However, preferencing the familiar, because it’s the easiest, most desirable option, clearly isn’t always in our best interests, even if it is conserving cognitive capacity in the short term.

Indeed, in the financial arena familiarity bias has been identified, meaning that investors often exclude perfectly valid, and potentially favourable investments in favour of that which they know. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n